Archive for November, 2007

Seeing Things

A client once told me that I had a “helicopter perspective”, by which I guess he meant I had the ability to see the big picture. What he didn’t say was I was also rapidly developing the ability to go in a revolving door behind him and come out ahead of him. In other words, I was becoming an account person!

That troubled me. As does the entire subject of “perspective” I was lobbying so heavily for the other day. Because even perspective has to be kept in perspective. It isn’t seeing all the angles so you can bullshit your way through a meeting and come out with a conscience it should only take two or three single malts to Dry-Erase back to lily-white purity.

Perspective is about clearly seeing what’s going on at the moment, factoring in all that you know of the past and extrapolating as best you can what the future may hold. So you can give your client advice that has a modicum of net present value.

For example, you’ve heard the expression “looking through the wrong end of the telescope”? Well, I just went through an experience with a client–and it isn’t the first time–where he was looking through the right end of the telescope, but the picture he was getting was all wrong. What he was telling me was that he wanted his brand to follow in the footsteps of Apple, Nike or any number of other marketing icons. Certainly a laudable objective. However, what he was failing to see was how long it took those brands to attain that stature. Unbeknownst to him, his “telescope” was not only compressing physical space, it was also compressing time. And that “perspective” can lead to no end of heartache.

Many people have said it, but I heard it first from Marty Puris when he described his agency, Ammirati & Puris as being “an overnight success ten years in the making.” That’s how things work, in life, advertising, sex of the mutually rewarding variety, you name it. They take time and often a lot more time than the average person initially had in mind. But advertising, more’s the pity, is not one of those devices like they had on the bridge of the Enterprise that can simply beam you where you want to be. (Actually, that’s lucky for some clients or I would have long ago beamed them to a place not well known for its sunsets or sunrises.)

Which is why I would suggest that any client with this sort of lofty objective in mind go back and take a look at what Apple or Nike was doing 20 or 30 years ago. To get some perspective, and see just how long it took these brands to get where they are today. Not so these clients will then abandon the mission. But rather, so they realize what a painfully slow, methodical trek getting there is bound to be.

Honestly, I wish some of the telescopes clients are so found of looking through were like the trick ones the Little Rascals had. You know, the kind where after you take it away from your face it leaves a black smudge all around the eye you had pressed to it? That way they could look in the mirror and see the only thing that trying to compress a 30-year accomplishment into 3 months is likely to get them.

“It’s Easy To Criticize”

Shit, crap, dog-doo, bat guano, horse manure, garbage, offal…No, this isn’t a lame rendition of that old George Carlin routine. It’s just a sampling of the terms often used by creative people to describe advertising they feel missed the mark. But as a different Mark, a favorite art director partner of mine, used to say: “It’s easy to criticize.”

Easy and far more counterproductive than many of us realize. Because these hyperbolic epithets are at the extreme, opposite end of the hysteria spectrum from the words clients generally use to describe suboptimal advertising efforts. Words like, well, “suboptimal” for one. Or “less than we had hoped for.” And it is this chasm that exists between unbridled opprobrium of creative people and the shrugging dismissal of clients that creates all sorts of problems. Not least of which is an almost total loss of respect for either side’s point of view or ability to be constructively critical. Continue reading ‘“It’s Easy To Criticize”’

Snews Of The Week

Ever since I read that Dostoevsky got some of his inspiration for “Crime and Punishment” from a little article he saw in a St. Petersburg newspaper, I’ve combed the nooks and crannies of every paper I so much as glance at. So far, old Fyodor has nothing to fear from me in the fiction department, but I do run into some tidbits that come in handy here.

For example, last week there was a squib headlined: “Publicis Venture Aims for Efficiency” in The Wall Street Journal. And I kid you not, this is what it said:

“Starting next year, Publicis Groupe will let clients get media, digital and creative services from the same single provider–part of an effort to offer marketers more efficiency and boost the sagging fortunes of its Leo Burnett unit.” Continue reading ‘Snews Of The Week’

Kissing Cousins

By general agreement, any two ads in a campaign should exhibit a fairly close family resemblance. That’s kind of a no-brainer. However, they should also do another thing that’s not quite as simple: They should kiss with equal ardor.

Huh? (I know, “where is he going with this one?”) Bear with me and I think you’ll see.

As some of you will know from reading my book, I have this “Dating 101/Seduction” analogy for all aspects of marketing communications that has yet to fail me. Even the latest techniques seem to fit right into it. After all, what is “behavioral targeting” aside from the marketing equivalent of figuring out the object of your affection is more interested in the symphony than philately and adjusting your approach accordingly? Continue reading ‘Kissing Cousins’

The Old Testament

One of the things I promised the kids at wk12 was that shortly after I got home I would send them a reading list. Which I promptly did. However, no sooner had I assembled it and hit the send key then I realized it had been years since I’d read some of these fucking things myself. Like Claude Hopkins’ My Life In Advertising, for example. So, fearing it might be only slightly more germane to their lives in advertising than my own antediluvian perspectives, I immediately sat down to re-read it.

And get a load of these apples. I’d only gotten as far as page 18 when I ran across this passage: “The people of those days (he’s referring to about 1886) believed that medicine must be horrible to be effective…We used ’snake oil’ and ’skunk oil’ presumably because of their names. Unless the cure was worse than the disease, no one would respect it.” Continue reading ‘The Old Testament’

Potpourri For $100

Always a good Jeopardy! category for autodidacts and anyone with a touch of ADHD (the national malaise it sometimes seems). And not a bad way for me to dispense with a few things that have been rattling around in my head waiting for the right moment, starting with a terrific book I just finished.

It’s called Naked Economics and you couldn’t hope to find a better overview of the subject. Less of a slog than The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money (although missing Keynes brilliant comparison of the stock market to a beauty pageant) and easily as engaging as P.J. O’Rourke’s On The Wealth Of Nations, it’s an exceptionally lucid account written by Charles Wheelan, a guy who was at one time (and maybe still is) the Midwest correspondent for The Economist magazine. A really worthwhile read.

Next up is a bit of shocking news I recently ran across regarding the performance of a very heavily advertised class of products: sleeping pills. Continue reading ‘Potpourri For $100′

Website development by: OpenMotive